Introduction: Lipid profile is an important determinant of cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetic patients. Available glucose-lowering agents can affect lipid levels. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors have been reported to reduce total cholesterol, but results are inconsistent across trials. The present metaanalysis was designed to assess the effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on blood lipids, verifying possible differences across compounds of this class. Methods: An extensive search of Medline and the Cochrane Library (any date up to December 31, 2010, restricted to randomized clinical trials, published in English) was performed for all trials containing, in any field, the words “sitagliptin,” “vildagliptin,” “saxagliptin,” “alogliptin,” “linagliptin,” and/or “dutogliptin.” Completed but unpublished trials were identified through a search of the ClinicalTrials.gov website, using the same keywords as above. Differences in the endpoint levels and absolute or percent variations of lipids were assessed. A metaregression was performed on the trials specified above to assess the effect of putative moderators on the effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on plasma lipids, considering all drugs together and each one separately. Results: Although the number of trials of appropriate size and duration was high (n=53), only a small fraction of those (n=17) reported data on endpoint total, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglyceride. The difference-in-means for endpoint versus baseline total cholesterol in patients on DPP-4 inhibitors treatment was significantly higher in comparison with controls, meaning that treatment with DPP-4 inhibitors is associated with a significant reduction in total cholesterol (–0.18 [–0.29; –0.06] mmol/L (–7.0 [–11.2; –2.50] mg/dL); P=0.002). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests a possible beneficial effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on cholesterol, which, although small, could contribute to the reduction of cardiovascular risk.

The pharmacologic management of atrial fibrillation (AF) includes rate and rhythm control strategies. Antiarrhythmic agents (eg, amiodarone, flecainide, and propafenone) are limited by serious toxicities (including proarrhythmic effects and pulmonary toxicity), which may lead to a reduced net clinical efficacy of rhythm control strategies. Dronedarone, a new antiarrhythmic agent, is effective in the maintenance of sinus rhythm. Dronedarone has also been shown to reduce ventricular rate and the incidence of hospitalization due to cardiovascular events. Dronedarone is recommended by the 2011 American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/Heart Rhythm Society guidelines update for the management of AF patients with no or minimal heart disease, coronary artery disease, and hypertension with no left ventricular hypertrophy. Dronedarone is contraindicated in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV heart failure or NYHA class II-III heart failure with a recent decompensation requiring hospitalization or referral to a specialized heart failure clinic.

Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have proven to be superior to tamoxifen in terms of time to disease progression in patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive (HR+) status and, nowadays, are used in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, and first-line therapy for advanced breast cancer. Letrozole is a third generation AI, as are anastrozole and exemestane. In the past, clinical studies had demonstrated that letrozole was effective as a second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In this paper, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of letrozole are reviewed along with its activity in preclinical and clinical settings. Additionally, the results of important clinical trials such as Breast International Group (BIG) 1-98, which tested the optimal initial adjuvant endocrine treatment and the sequential therapy with letrozole and tamoxifen, MA-17 that evaluates the benefits of extended adjuvant therapy, and other important studies in advanced and neoadjuvant disease, are reviewed. Safety comparisons of treatments are also addressed. Interestingly, about 50% of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancers are HR+. However, HER2 positivity is a marker of antiestrogen treatment resistance. Because of this, a dual treatment is a logical approach when both receptors are overexpressed. The combination of lapatinib and letrozole leads to a significant improvement in the overall disease outcome. Also, the combination of everolimus plus letrozole has been tested in this setting. In fact, the coadministration of both agents seems to increase the efficacy of letrozole in newly-diagnosed HR+ patients. Once resistance to sequential trastuzumab and AI as monotherapy has been found, trastuzumab and letrozole combined in HR+ and HER2+ patients with advanced breast cancer can overcome resistance to both drugs administered as single agents, according to recently reported results.